← All snapshots
Snapshot

Meta's own numbers on scam ads say more than its denials

A Reuters investigation found Meta capped anti-fraud enforcement to limit revenue loss, even as it projected scam and banned-goods advertising could generate close to $16bn a year.

By McCyber

Meta has spent years telling regulators it takes fraudulent advertising seriously. Internal documents obtained by Reuters suggest the company built that seriousness around a ceiling, not a floor: a so-called revenue guardrail that, as of a February 2025 memo, stopped its anti-fraud team taking enforcement action that would cost more than roughly 0.15 percent of total ad revenue — about $135m — even as internal estimates put annual revenue from scam and banned-goods ads at close to $16bn. Enforcement, in other words, was calibrated to a budget line.

The mechanism mattered as much as the number. Rather than banning flagged advertisers outright, Meta reportedly required 95 percent certainty of fraud before pulling the plug; accounts that fell short of that threshold were often left running, in some cases charged higher “penalty bids” rather than shut down. Some of the platform’s biggest spenders racked up hundreds of policy strikes without losing their accounts, and China was named internally as the top scam-exporting nation, with agencies serving Chinese clients linked to a large share of the banned-goods advertising getting through.

A platform that quietly prices its own fraud into the advertising business has already answered the question of how seriously it takes stopping it.

Meta disputes the framing. A spokesperson said the 0.15 percent figure came from an internal revenue-projection exercise rather than a hard enforcement cap, and communications chief Andy Stone has pushed back on Reuters’ characterisation of the reporting. That rebuttal doesn’t sit easily alongside the reported scale of the problem: Meta’s own safety team estimated the company served some 15 billion ads a day showing signs of fraud, and that its platforms were involved in roughly a third of successful scams in the United States. Whatever the guardrail’s precise status, the gap between what the system was built to allow and what the company says publicly is, increasingly, the actual product.